I encountered Malika Ghandi reaching out to readers on
Goodreads to promote her historical fiction, Freedom of the Monsoon. I
consider it important to give a chance to new indie writers when they have work
that seems unusual to me. I also thought
this was a good opportunity to read a novel taking place in India dealing with
how the British Raj was brought to an end.
I had never read about this period in India’s history. So I expected to learn a great deal from this
book, and that this would provide me with substantive content for this
blog.
It's from Freedom of the Monsoon that I learned that Mahatma
Gandhi developed his philosophy of satyagraha as a result of facing
apartheid in South Africa. I located his book on the subject in pdf format, Satyagraha in South Africa Readers should be aware that this book is almost five hundred pages in pdf.
Before I read Malika Ghandi's book I already knew that the satyagraha approach has been a model for many protest actions since then. I could see its continuing influence in this book. The echoes of the Quit India movement in demonstrations during the 1960’s and in recent actions of the U.S. Occupy movement were clearly visible. Satyagraha means non-violent resistance. Yet the response of the authorities to non-violent protest can be violent which can result in protesters fighting back. Reading how violence arose from non-violence in India has helped me to understand how it happened in local Occupy actions. One evidence for the continuing influence of satyagraha in India is the wheel in the center of India's flag. According to The Flag of India on I Love India. com , the 24 spoke wheel in the center of the flag of India is called the Ashoka Chakra. This web page quotes Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, India's first Vice President as saying that the Ashoka Chakra wheel symbolizes "the dynamism of peaceful change". It seems to me that the satyagraha philosophy is all about peaceful change. It is much admired by enlightened people throughout the world.
Another cross-cultural commonality that I found in Malika Ghandi’s book was the divo or “divine flame” that is lit by families for their departed members. Catholics light candles for the dead in churches and on home altars. Jews light Yohrzeit candles to mark the anniversaries of family deaths.
The character perspectives in Freedom of the Monsoon were intimate and powerful. I identified with the struggles of nearly all
of these characters. When we see Pooja
and other women suffer abuse, we realize that India had problems other than
being colonized. We also see English who
are portrayed sympathetically, but it’s obvious that these were exceptional
individuals who are capable of treating people of another culture as
equals. I also found it interesting to
read about English characters speaking of India as a refuge during WWII with
London having been devastated by bombing.
That is not a point of view that had occurred to me previously.
This novel briefly
deals with the Sepoy Revolt of 1857. It was an event that occurred about fifty years previous to Freedom of the Monsoon.
Sepoys were soldiers from India who had been conscripted into the
British military. Although their revolt had a number of causes, it was
precipitated by gun cartridges that were greased with cow and pig fat. Since
Sepoys needed to bite the cartridge to
release the powder, the beef grease was offensive to Hindus who consider cows
sacred, and the pig grease offended Muslims who are forbidden to eat pigs. Wikipedia
states in its article on Mangal Pandey, the Sepoy who began the revolt, at Mangal Pandey on Wikipedia that this was only a rumor, and that these
cartridges were really greased with beeswax and linseed oil. There are notes included with that section of
the article that point out that there are no sources given for this
information. There is also a well-sourced
Wikipedia article at Indian Revolt of 1857 which confirms that some cartridges were
greased with animal fat. This illustrates that Wikipedia is selectively useful, and that the Sepoys had a legitimate religious discrimination complaint.
My only problem with Freedom of the Monsoon is that Goa, a city in India that was ruled by the Portuguese, seemed to be portrayed as if it were idyllic. I recognize that a book that is tightly focused on character perspectives will only show you the viewpoints of those characters. Nevertheless, Malika Ghandi presented historical material about the British Raj and how the people of India were impacted by it. I would have appreciated seeing a bit of historical perspective on Goa. A historical fantasy called Goa: Blood of the Goddess by Kara Dalkey which I read some time ago, deals centrally with the Inquisition in Goa in the 16th century. A page at Goa.com about the Portuguese Conquest of Goa says that the Portuguese massacred the entire Muslim community when they first occupied Goa, and that Hindus in Goa were forcibly converted to Christianity from 1540-1759. Tolerance for Hinduism was established in Goa in 1759 when the Jesuits were banned, but it doesn't erase the fact that Hindus had been persecuted in Goa for more than two centuries. Wouldn't this history have an impact on how Hindu Goans would have viewed Portuguese rule? I am also aware that Goa and other Portuguese colonial possessions did not join the rest of India in independence in 1947.
Although I feel that my criticism of the portrayal of Goa is significant , I think that the novel as a whole is a strong one. I was moved by the characters' experiences. I would also like to thank Malika Ghandi for teaching me so much about India's history and culture.
I really liked the fact that Hindi and Gujarati words were linked to their English translations in the glossary. This was a very user friendly format. If I had been reading a print version of Freedom of the Monsoon, I would have spent extra time searching through the glossary rather than going directly to the right word. Through this glossary I was able to build a small vocabulary in Hindi and Gujarati.
My only problem with Freedom of the Monsoon is that Goa, a city in India that was ruled by the Portuguese, seemed to be portrayed as if it were idyllic. I recognize that a book that is tightly focused on character perspectives will only show you the viewpoints of those characters. Nevertheless, Malika Ghandi presented historical material about the British Raj and how the people of India were impacted by it. I would have appreciated seeing a bit of historical perspective on Goa. A historical fantasy called Goa: Blood of the Goddess by Kara Dalkey which I read some time ago, deals centrally with the Inquisition in Goa in the 16th century. A page at Goa.com about the Portuguese Conquest of Goa says that the Portuguese massacred the entire Muslim community when they first occupied Goa, and that Hindus in Goa were forcibly converted to Christianity from 1540-1759. Tolerance for Hinduism was established in Goa in 1759 when the Jesuits were banned, but it doesn't erase the fact that Hindus had been persecuted in Goa for more than two centuries. Wouldn't this history have an impact on how Hindu Goans would have viewed Portuguese rule? I am also aware that Goa and other Portuguese colonial possessions did not join the rest of India in independence in 1947.
Although I feel that my criticism of the portrayal of Goa is significant , I think that the novel as a whole is a strong one. I was moved by the characters' experiences. I would also like to thank Malika Ghandi for teaching me so much about India's history and culture.
I really liked the fact that Hindi and Gujarati words were linked to their English translations in the glossary. This was a very user friendly format. If I had been reading a print version of Freedom of the Monsoon, I would have spent extra time searching through the glossary rather than going directly to the right word. Through this glossary I was able to build a small vocabulary in Hindi and Gujarati.