I enjoy both fantasy and science fiction. I tend to like well written books that combine aspects of both genres. So I was pleased to review The Lodestone Trilogy for The Bookplex.
I agree with those who have called this book science
fantasy. I define this sub-genre as science fiction for people who prefer
fantasy. It feels like fantasy. This is
a quest narrative which is a fantasy trope.
There are numerous parallels to Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings which include a fellowship of individuals from
several different species pursuing the quest. There are also some noticeable similarities
to the Darkover science fantasy series created by Marion Zimmer Bradley. Like the planet of Darkover, the world where
this trilogy takes place has evolved a technology that sets it apart. On Darkover it’s called matrix
technology. In The Lodestone Trilogy, the technology is built on lodestone. There are explanations for how these
technologies work, but they don’t exist in our real world. So it’s fictional extrapolation rather than
actual science. There is a long
tradition of science fiction extrapolation, and it’s perfectly legitimate
within the genre. I personally don’t have a problem with Mark Whiteway’s
extrapolation because the supporting explanations are internally
consistent. This means that his work is
conceptually solid.
The first and third books in the trilogy are very
action-oriented, but the middle book is more character driven. We delve into the central characters and get
to know them better. Since I like in
depth characterization, I was glad to find it in this trilogy. The character development from the second
book carried me into the third feeling more invested in the protagonists. I consider this a narrative strategy that made
The Lodestone Trilogy more
compelling.
I didn’t care for the abrupt ending. No doubt this was an attempt to insure that
there would be interest in the sequel. I
prefer fiction that’s more self-contained.
I feel that the quality of The
Lodestone Trilogy is sufficient that readers would be eager for more
without the obvious tactic of leaving the story unfinished.
About Science Fantasy
"Science fantasy" has been very subjectively defined and there are a number of different perspectives on what it means. So I thought I would give you a sampling of these perspectives.
Here is an amusing essay by Randy Henderson that appeared in Fantasy magazine:
Is It Science Fiction or Science Fantasy?
Here is a guest blog article by science fiction romance author, Heather Massey:
An Ode To Science Fantasy
Here is an article from About.com which attempts to define where Star Wars belongs in the genre landscape:
To What Genre Does Star Wars Belong?
At the end of the day, whether you enjoyed the book is probably more important for a reader than what genre box you put it in, but many people really like to classify. I am one of them. I draw genre lines my own way. Other readers are also welcome to do so. Have fun with it.
Here is a guest blog article by science fiction romance author, Heather Massey:
An Ode To Science Fantasy
Here is an article from About.com which attempts to define where Star Wars belongs in the genre landscape:
To What Genre Does Star Wars Belong?
At the end of the day, whether you enjoyed the book is probably more important for a reader than what genre box you put it in, but many people really like to classify. I am one of them. I draw genre lines my own way. Other readers are also welcome to do so. Have fun with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment