These are the reasons why I reacted the way I did to Guillermina and the Rose which I reviewed for The Bookplex. I may not have been born in California, but I have lived in California more than thirty years.
Let me say that Guillermina and the Rose is in many ways a wonderful book, but there was an element of tremendous importance that was missing. I would have been remiss if I failed to mention it in the review that appears below.
The author of this book is listed as Don Cush, but the
experiences described are those of Robert Nielsen, an American executive
employed by a computer technology firm who makes a fateful trip to Mexico. I’d imagine that Guillermina and the Rose is an “as told to” memoir. This means that
the subject of the memoir told his story to a professional writer.
I wish I could say I was shocked by what Robert Nielsen
discovered about a Catholic orphanage in Tijuana, Mexico. Unfortunately, I am well aware of the existence
of child trafficking . Children often
become victims as a result of poverty, as this author points out. He also posits that pre-Conquest Aztec
attitudes might be a factor. Yet it
seems to me that there is actually a prevalent cross-cultural belief that
children are property which fuels crimes against children worldwide. Guillermina
and the Rose is the chronicle of a child who was thrown away as unwanted,
and might have died unknown. Robert Nielsen not only saves her life, he
discovers that she has astonishing gifts.
Although this book is a very personal memoir, it also deals
with an important trend in education. I was very interested in Nielsen’s
leading edge introduction of computers into classrooms. Pioneering efforts like Nielsen’s eventually
led to the current development of online instructional programs that allow
students to acquire an education without leaving their homes. So this author’s professional accomplishments
are definitely notable.
There was an editing flaw in this book that I noticed. Some
persons were inconsistently named. Names
were evidently altered possibly for legal reasons. I wouldn’t bring this up
except that it seems like a search and replace process for a re-named person
that was almost completely successful, is probably responsible for the removal
of Our Lady of Guadelupe from this book.
Our Lady of Guadelupe is extremely important in Mexican culture. For the Mexican-Americans that I have known,
she is at the heart of their spirituality.
I was taken aback when I saw the patron saint of Mexico given another
name in this book. This problem even
undermines the symbolism of this memoir’s title. Roses are a central image in the story of Our
Lady of Guadelupe. This makes the
incident of Guillermina being given a rose emblematic from a religious and
cultural standpoint. If there is a new edition of Guillermina and the Rose ,
I would definitely recommend the
restoration of Our Lady of Guadelupe to her rightful place.
No comments:
Post a Comment